Advocacy Blog: NAB Broadcasting Mixed Signals Over Aereo

Daryl P. Friedman's picture

Daryl P. Friedman

  • Photo: Bloomberg/Getty Images
    David Frederick (center), outside counsel for Aereo, speaks to the media in front of the U.S. Supreme Court Building after oral arguments in the case ABC vs. Aereo on April 22.

On April 22 the Supreme Court heard arguments in ABC vs. Aereo. Traditional broadcasters (represented by the National Association of Broadcasters in D.C.) are steadfast in their reasoning: No company or individual should be able to profit from content that doesn't belong to them.

This is the main message of their argument against Aereo, the upstart Internet company that uses small antennas to capture free local TV programming and transmit it to subscribers who can download and stream it at their convenience — for a monthly fee. Aereo doesn't pay a penny to the television broadcasters for the right to redistribute their shows over the Internet, and the broadcasters are hopping mad — as they should be. According to them, another entity should not be able to appropriate that content for nothing and resell it. We at The Recording Academy support this concept; in fact, we even participated in an amicus brief supporting the broadcasters.

Gordon Smith, the NAB's president and CEO, summed it up nicely in The Washington Post: "Quite simply, Aereo takes copyrighted material, profits from it and does so without compensating copyright holders."

But if you've noticed a little static with the NAB's position, do not adjust your television, there is nothing wrong with your set. Simply replace "Aereo" with "radio" in the quote above and the problem will be clarified in high-definition.

The NAB also represents the traditional radio stations, which for decades have gotten away with not paying artists for their copyrighted works. How can the NAB take two such drastically differing positions on the same principle?

It's time the broadcasters took a close look at their own stance on the issue of "highly valued content" and accept the inevitability of a performance rights act that will protect all content creators. If they continue to send mixed signals, the courts and Congress may simply tune them out.

Benefits of Membership

The Recording Academy is the preeminent organization for musicians, producers, engineers and other music professionals. Our mission is to advance artistic and technical excellence, work to ensure a vital and free creative environment, and act as an advocate on behalf of music and its makers.

Our members have access to live events all around the country, as well as 24/7 access to the GRAMMY Pro library of video and editorial content, which explores the industry and craft of music.

Learn More

Program Events

More events are being planned. Check back soon for announcements.

Program Information

“Everyone knows that The Academy bestows the GRAMMY Awards every year for artistic achievement, but more people need to know that this organization works hard on behalf of its members to create a level economic playing field—one that promotes innovation and ensures financial viability for all music creators.” – Zac Brown, GRAMMY winner Zac Brown Band, GRAMMYs on the Hill 2016

“I've been around The Recording Academy for many years. While many know the organization for its annual GRAMMY Awards... it's really inspiring to see firsthand the Academy's efforts here in Washington and the impact and the value it has on our very own music industry.” – Clive Davis, Chief Creative Officer, Sony Music Entertainment, GRAMMYs on The Hill 2012

“I applaud NARAS for their efforts to further the cause of creator rights and hope all of us join in to help them.” -- Irving Azoff, Chairman/CEO, Azoff MSG Entertainment, Salute To Icons 2016

Program Sponsors